Video & Photo
29th Ha Yeong gu
28th Suh, Jung jin
27th Kwon, Young Gull
26th Saeil Park
25th Ahn, Chul Soo
24th Lee Sukjoon
23th Joe, Kyung-tae
22th Oh, Se-hoon
21th Taekwon, Cho
20th Hwan-Kyu, Rho
19th Kim, Bookyum
18th Lee, Minhwa
17th Ok Dong Suk
16th Lee Charm
15th Ryoo Kihl-jae
14th Kim, Jong In
13th Oh Kyung Hwan
12th Park Byung Soon
11th Chung Mong-Joon
10th Rhee In-Je
st Adieu 2012
9nd Oh, Sang Rok
8rd Lee, Jung Hyun
7th Hwang, Joo Ho
6th Lee,Seok Chae
5th Chang, Yong Dong
4th Lee, Yong Seob
3th Cho,Eun Gi
2th Kim, Jong Hoon
1th Kim, Sung Eun






15th Global Leaders Forum

Date : '14.02.19




15th Global Leaders Forum
Chairwoman's Opening remark

Date : '14.02.19
Videotaped by Jang, Hee Seoung


15th Global Leaders Forum
Special lecture

Date : '14.02.19
Speaker : Ryoo Kihl-jae
Unification Minister

Lecture Summary

Lecture Summary

The Direction and Tasks for the Reunification of the Korean Peninsula
Unification Minister Ryoo Kihl-jae

Is Reunification a Bonanza?
Reunification of the Korean peninsula is a must and thus any discussion about its necessity or benefits is unnecessary. Reunification is a matter of regaining the ethnic identity of the Korean community, including people in South and North Korea and even expatriates. Koreans just need to heal from the scars left by the turbulent past 120 years in which their sovereignty was lost and the country was divided. Because we're brothers, we need to be one nation again. Are we trying to unite again because it will make this country stronger and more affluent? Hardly, it's not a matter of political or economic interests. What the President said about reunification in the new year's press conference is just stirring hope and expectations for reunification by calling this self-evident destination a bonanza.

Bringing about People's Interest and Consensus with Cultural Approaches
We've had many political, economic, and military macro-discussions about reunification since the separation of the country. We've worked on estimating how much good or bad is expected from reunification. However, it's almost impossible to have practical estimates about such a massive enterprise. The destination and steps toward it should be framed by the people and their grassroots communities rather than by the government or research teams. Only by drawing out the people's consensus can we build sustainable reunification strategies that won't just be replaced with the changing of government administrations. These days, we don't have much divergence between the liberals and conservatives or between the ruling or opposing parties concerning issues related to reunification. The Ministry of Unification is trying to make many cultural opportunities to discuss what we agree upon. We especially want to support cultural networking so that more young people might have more interest and opinions on this issue since they are the very ones that will carry it out.

We First, then North Korea, then the International Community
I believe we first need to open ourselves through communication and consensus building. We haven't revised the official reunification steps which were made during the Cold War and we have reacted to North Korea so frivolously only when they made some shameful issues like nuclear bomb experiments, massive flooding, or the killing of the ruler's relatives. I believe it's time for the South Koreans to make a change in their idea that North Korea needs to change first. Reunification means doing something together. That's why we need to open ourselves first. The opening of South Korea, responsiveness from North Korea, and harmonious support from the international community are what we need for reunification.

Translation by Kang, Soo Jung
President of Salt&Light







15th Global Leaders Forum Q&A